Dashboard & Review History
The dashboard is the control room for your workspace. It gives admins, managers, and viewers a quick read on review coverage and the current quality signal across recent PRs.
Dashboard metrics
The main dashboard shows:
| Metric | What it means |
|---|---|
| PRs reviewed | Total pull requests VULQN has reviewed for the workspace. |
| Active repos | Repositories currently enabled for automatic review. |
| Normal credits | Remaining normal review capacity. |
| Peer credits | Remaining peer review capacity, or disabled when no peer review capacity exists. |
| Open critical and medium findings | Active risk that still needs attention. |
The review list shows recent PRs with provider, repository, source and target branch, severity counts, top categories, and confidence score.
Review detail pages
Open any review to inspect it in more detail. The review detail page includes:
- PR title, number, branch pair, and source-control link.
- Current review status: open, in review, failed, merged, or closed.
- Confidence score.
- Critical, medium, and praise counts.
- Open, resolved, and acknowledged finding counts.
- Category breakdown.
- Findings grouped by severity or by file.
- Links back to the original GitHub or Bitbucket comment threads.
Resolved and acknowledged findings remain visible in the review history so the team can audit what happened without keeping noisy PR threads open forever.
Failed reviews
Failed reviews appear in the dashboard and review detail pages. VULQN surfaces the reason when it can:
| Reason | What to do |
|---|---|
| SCM connection was revoked | Reconnect the provider from Settings. |
| PR diff too large to review | Split the PR into smaller changes. |
| Processing error | Retry by pushing a new commit or using !vulqn review. Contact support if it repeats. |
Category trends
The dashboard and review list aggregate categories across visible review activity. This is useful for spotting patterns:
- Security and bug findings indicate merge risk.
- Testing findings can show where coverage is thin.
- Maintainability findings often point to code that will slow future changes.
- Error handling findings are useful for reliability and supportability work.
Use those patterns in planning. VULQN is not only a PR commenter; it gives engineering leaders a lightweight way to see where review pressure is going.
Review capacity
The dashboard also shows normal and peer review usage. Credits are counted separately:
- Normal credits cover standard reviews.
- Peer credits cover the optional second-pass peer review.
- Add-on credits are included in the displayed capacity.
Admins can manage plans and add-ons from Settings -> Billing.